Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38522842

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of the rapid syndromic BioFire® Joint Infection Panel (BF-JIP) to detect bacterial and fungal pathogens, as well as antibiotic resistance genes, directly in synovial fluid specimens collected from patients with acute arthritis. METHODS: The study was conducted in six French bacteriological laboratories. To assess the performances of BF-JIP, results were compared with those of synovial fluid 14-day culture and, in case of discrepancy, with those of complementary molecular methods and intraoperative samples. A total of 308 synovial fluid specimens were tested after collection from 308 adults and children presenting with clinical and biological suspicion of acute arthritis; patients presenting with acute periprosthetic joint infection were included according to the European Bone and Joint Infection Society 2021 criteria. RESULTS: Only one specimen failed (no result). On the basis of the consolidated data, the BF-JIP was concordant with the 14-day culture in 280 (91.2%) of the 307 specimens finally included in the study. The positive percentage agreement was 84.9% (95% CI, 78.8-89.8%) and the negative percentage agreement was 100% (95% CI, 97.2-100%). The positive predictive value was extremely high (100%; 95% CI, 97.6-100%), whereas the negative predictive value was lower (82.6%; 95% CI, 75.7-88.2%), partially explained by the missing target species in the panel. DISCUSSION: The BF-JIP showed high performances to detect pathogens involved in acute arthritis.

2.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 106(3): 115950, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37182374

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) performance of positive blood cultures (PBC) VITEK®2 off-label use (D0) and traditional VITEK®2 workflow using isolated colonies after overnight (D1). METHODS: Patient samples with monomicrobial Gram-negative rod or Gram-positive cocci in clusters bacteremia were tested on D0 and compared to D1 AST results in 7 laboratories in France. RESULTS: Overall, categorical and essential agreement rates were 98.4% and 96.7%, respectively. Very major discrepancy and major discrepancy rates for Enterobacterales and Staphylococci satisfied the NF EN ISO 20776-2 (2007) criteria for sepsis-relevant drugs. Very major discrepancies were >3% for amoxicillin-clavulanate (4.9%, 6/122), piperacillin-tazobactam (7.5%, 4/53) and meropenem (33%,1/3) for Enterobacterales and gentamicin for Staphylococci (4.6%, 4/87). CONCLUSION: Direct AST from PBC broths by VITEK®2 for Enterobacterales and Staphylococci is reliable and fast and may positively influence antimicrobial stewardship.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Gammaproteobacteria , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas , Humanos , Cultivo de Sangre/métodos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Staphylococcus
3.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 76(12): 3175-3182, 2021 11 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34477840

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy, susceptibility and specificity of MYCOPLASMA IST3, the next generation of the most popular culture-based in vitro diagnostic device designed to detect, identify and test the susceptibility of urogenital mycoplasma infections. METHODS: MYCOPLASMA IST3 was evaluated against culture- and molecular-based gold standard methodologies to detect, identify, enumerate and determine antimicrobial resistance for Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma species in 516 clinical samples collected across France, Serbia and the UK. Sample types included vulvovaginal/endocervical or urethral swabs (dry swab or eSwab®), semen and urine samples, which included blinded analysis following addition of a panel of 80 characterized control strains. RESULTS: Overall species identification was excellent for both Ureaplasma spp. (98.4% sensitivity, 99.7% specificity) and M. hominis (95.7% sensitivity, 100% specificity) relative to combined colony morphology on agar and quantitative PCR standards. Non-dilution-based bacterial load estimation by the assay was accurate between 83.7% (M. hominis) and 86.3% (Ureaplasma spp.) of the time (increased to 94.2% and 100%, respectively, if ±10-fold variance was allowed) relative to colonies counted on agar. Resistance accuracy for Ureaplasma spp. varied from gold standards for only 11/605 of individual tests (major error rate = 1.8%) and for 14/917 individual tests for M. hominis (major error rate = 1.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The redesigned MYCOPLASMA IST3 assay eliminated previous shortcomings by providing independent accurate resistance screening of M. hominis and Ureaplasma species, even in mixed infections, with CLSI-compliant thresholds. Specificity, sensitivity and enumeration estimates correlated closely with the confirmatory methods.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Mycoplasma , Mycoplasma , Infecciones por Ureaplasma , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Infecciones por Mycoplasma/diagnóstico , Mycoplasma hominis/genética , Ureaplasma , Infecciones por Ureaplasma/diagnóstico , Ureaplasma urealyticum/genética
4.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 78(3): 313-5, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24374309

RESUMEN

The GeneXpert MRSA/SA SSTI assay was compared to conventional cultures to detect Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistance from 91 bone and joint infection samples. Sensitivity and specificity were 94.4% and 100%. Three false-positive results were observed, in fact providing from patients known to be infected by S. aureus on the basis of other concomitant osteoarticular samples, which suggests that PCR was more sensitive than culture. This diagnosis accuracy may help shorten toxic and non-optimal empirical therapies such as glycopeptides in case of methicillin-susceptible strains.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Infecciosa/diagnóstico , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Enfermedades Óseas/diagnóstico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Artritis Infecciosa/microbiología , Enfermedades Óseas/microbiología , Humanos
5.
PLoS One ; 8(6): e67240, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23840636

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus epidermidis orthopedic device infections are caused by direct inoculation of commensal flora during surgery and remain rare, although S. epidermidis carriage is likely universal. We wondered whether S. epidermidis orthopedic device infection strains might constitute a sub-population of commensal isolates with specific virulence ability. Biofilm formation and invasion of osteoblasts by S. aureus contribute to bone and joint infection recurrence by protecting bacteria from the host-immune system and most antibiotics. We aimed to determine whether S. epidermidis orthopedic device infection isolates could be distinguished from commensal strains by their ability to invade osteoblasts and form biofilms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Orthopedic device infection S. epidermidis strains (n = 15) were compared to nasal carriage isolates (n = 22). Osteoblast invasion was evaluated in an ex vivo infection model using MG63 osteoblastic cells co-cultured for 2 hours with bacteria. Adhesion of S. epidermidis to osteoblasts was explored by a flow cytometric approach, and internalized bacteria were quantified by plating cell lysates after selective killing of extra-cellular bacteria with gentamicin. Early and mature biofilm formations were evaluated by a crystal violet microtitration plate assay and the Biofilm Ring Test method. RESULTS: No difference was observed between commensal and infective strains in their ability to invade osteoblasts (internalization rate 308+/-631 and 347+/-431 CFU/well, respectively). This low internalization rate correlated with a low ability to adhere to osteoblasts. No difference was observed for biofilm formation between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Osteoblast invasion and biofilm formation levels failed to distinguish S. epidermidis orthopedic device infection strains from commensal isolates. This study provides the first assessment of the interaction between S. epidermidis strains isolated from orthopedic device infections and osteoblasts, and suggests that bone cell invasion is not a major pathophysiological mechanism in S. epidermidis orthopedic device infections, contrary to what is observed for S. aureus.


Asunto(s)
Biopelículas , Osteoblastos/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Staphylococcus epidermidis/fisiología , Adhesión Bacteriana , Línea Celular , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado , Interacciones Huésped-Patógeno , Humanos , Filogenia , Polimorfismo de Longitud del Fragmento de Restricción , Prótesis e Implantes/microbiología , Staphylococcus epidermidis/genética , Staphylococcus epidermidis/patogenicidad , Virulencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...